When the Saint becomes a Sinner

Well, as I'm sure you know by now the Times dropped a bombshell and the Post has a few more details on St. McCain "relationship" with telecom lobbyist Vicki Iseman. At first when I heard of this story, I must admit, I was very excited. Since I am, for all practical purposes, a horrible person, I was delighted to see information brought forth that would cause holy John pain. But then I remembered hearing about a story back in December that John McCain was begging, and I mean BEGGING, the Times to sit on. After reading this superb post by Josh Marshall over at Talking Points Memo (congrats on the Polk award!) I was actually kind of upset. Marshall points out that this actually great timing for this story to come out. Also, Marshall speculates that the Times nows much more about the "relationship" than they are letting on:

At the moment it seems to me that we have a story from the Times that reads like it's had most of the meat lawyered out of it. And a lot of miscellany and fluff has been packed in where the meat was. Still, if the Times sources are to be believed, the staff thought he was having an affair with Iseman and when confronted about it he in so many words conceded that he was (much of course hangs on 'behaving inappropriately' but then, doesn't it always?) and promised to shape up. And whatever the personal relationship it was a stem wound about a lobbying branch.

I find it very difficult to believe that the Times would have put their chin so far out on this story if they didn't know a lot more than they felt they could put in the article, at least on the first go. But in a decade of doing this, I've learned not to give any benefits of the doubt, even to the most esteemed institutions.

Not cool! Nevertheless, I still think this will be damaging to McCain. It's also a good sign that the mainstream media was willing to put out a story, albeit a watered down version, that has negative implications for St. McCain. Baby steps people, baby steps. Matt Yglesias also has an interesting post about the Iseman controversy. He brings up the point that McCain has frequently philandered in the past and he left his last wife to marry an heiress and used her money to finance his political future.

What a great guy, huh?

OK, More St. McCain

I realize that this blog has been focusing a great deal on St. John McCain of Arizona, son of God, heir to the throne of Lord a great deal. I'll be upfront, I'm borderline obessessed with the guy. Also, he just so happens to be the almost certain nominee for the GOP's presidential ticket. So let's be honest...this blog will have many, many, more posts on holy John. In other words, if your sick of reading about McCain, then don't read the blog. But you should, because if you rely on the mainstream media for your information on the presidentail candidates, you probably have a certain perspective of John McCain that is, frankly, bullshit. Two articles that you should read on St. McCain of Arizona:

1. Paul Waldman's at the American Prospect
2. Jonathan Chait's at the New Republic

The first article will explain why I call John McCain, St. McCain. It is required reading, so consider it homework, it's very short, and you'll be smarter for reading it. Waldman is an expert on the media, and his dissection of the media's treatment of McCain is essential.

The second article, by one of my favorite political writers ever, Jonathan Chait, explains how St. McCain has changed his views on a number of key issues a number of times, usually taking whichever stand the political winds blow him (interesting for a supposed man of principle). In essence, John McCain is the ultimate flip-flopper.

Do yourself a favor and read these articles, learn who John McCain really is. Then do your friends and family a favor and pass the articles on to them.

McCain Youth Group

Check out this post by Justin Logan at Cato, and Matt's commentary. This is part of what really scares me about McCain. The media never reports this side of the guy. Instead we just here about how much of a "maverick" he is, I mean Chris Matthews clearly wants to have the guy's babies. Anyways, back to my point, McCain's only real priority is national security. He has said in the past that he doesn't now a lot about the economy (perfect, for a country with a housing market in free-fall and scant consumer confidence). Really, all he cares about war. McCain's politics are clearly driven by a form of militaristic nationalism that could have disastourous consequences for the country. Waging war for the sake of war is hardly admirable. This is why I'm less concerned over the prospect of a Romney, Paul, or Huckabee presidency. Obviously Ron Paul and Huck have insane domestic policy proposals and the Mittster is a corporate demagogue; but they would have to gain the approval of Congress to actualize any of these policies. Foreign policy is the commander-in-chief's playground. McCain could send troops anywhere virtually unimpedded by anyone. Something to think about....