The Onion: McCain Accidently Left on Bus

Via Andrew Sullivan, The Onion is probably America's best media outlet!

The Deconstruction of "Joe the Plumber" (Plus Debate Thoughts)

Alright kids, since John McCain (and to a certain extent, Barack Obama) decided to make "Joe the Plumber" the most important voter in the United States of America, I think it's only appropriate that we get some of the facts straight on Mr. Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher. First off, it's important to note that according to the Toledo Blade, "Joe the Plumber" is a registered Republican. John McCain was making him out to be an undecided voter. Now, I will acknowledge that it is possible for a partisan to be undecided, however it's reasonable to conclude that Mr. Wurzelbacher's political affiliation is an important caveat in this instance. Also, according to ABC News' Chief National Correspondent Jake Tapper, "Joe the Plumber" would actually receive a tax cut under Obama's plan, as he admits that his income would be well under $250,000. It gets better, Sam Stein over at the Huffington Post reveals that "Joe the Plumber" has long been confused by taxes. In fact the state of Ohio has filed liens against our hero "Joe the Plumber" because he has failed to pay the entirety of what he owes. Basically what we appear to have here, is a partisan Republican know-nothing masquerading as an undecided voter. His intent is to score political points for John McCain as the "every man" skeptic of Obama's intentions. In short, "Joe the Plumber" is a fraud and a massive tool!

Alright, now that we've efficiently dispatched of "Joe the Plumber" let's move on to the debate in which he was mentioned numerous times. I agree with most of the talking heads that McCain seemed to be in control for the first 30 minutes. He was managing to effectively seize the offensive on the issue of the economy. However, I feel that he began to lose his composure after his numerous jabs couldn't seem to find a whole in Obama's defenses. John McCain looked enraged the whole time. A friend with whom I was watching the debate with remarked that his blinking was bound to trigger epileptic seizures. My take on McCain's many grimaces and sighs was that he really needed to go to the bathroom. Anyways, I digress. McCain also said a number of things that are sure to inspire a lot of controversy. First, when he used scare quotes to argue that the "health" of a pregnant woman was something that the "pro-abortion movement*" stretched to mean almost anything. This is extremely offensive and insensitive to the legitimate health concerns that can be the consequence of an unplanned pregnancy. I can only imagine that women voters did not react particularly favorably to this snide remark by McCain. Secondly, I thought it was striking when McCain said that we shouldn't "spread the wealth." I'm quite puzzled by this as McCain seems to be taking pleasure in the acute inequality that plagues American society. Many Republicans have leveled at least somewhat persuasive arguments over the years that progressive taxation is unfair, however few have seemed to take delight in the plight of the less fortunate, and bragged about how their candidacy would not address their economic shortcomings. Finally, I thought McCain's best moment was when he told Barack Obama that he's not George Bush. However, I feel like Obama effectively parried this by stating that he realizes that McCain isn't Bush but he was naturally confused because the economic philosophy championed by the Mac is eerily similar to that of W's. Overall, I thought the debate was easily won by Obama. He certainly didn't have his best performance, but considering the large lead he's currently nursing in the polls, he hardly needed to knock it out of the park. Particularly in regard to his tax policy and health care plan, Obama levied concise arguments that I believe will resonate well with voters concerned about the economy. Moreover, Obama was calm and collected. In short, he was presidential. McCain was noticeably uncomfortable. It was clear to anyone with half a brain that McCain was seriously pissed and that he holds nothing but udder disdain for Obama.

*It always sends me into a fit of rage when conservatives and pro-lifers label those in support of abortion rights "pro-abortion." Nobody is "pro-abortion." Abortion is a horrible thing, and Obama was correct to point out that the main goal should be to reduce the number of abortions in America. However, the religious right has insisted on dubbing those who support choice as "pro-abortion" which is offensive and just plain wrong. It's wrong because if you follow this reasoning to it's logical conclusion, anyone that was "pro-abortion" would believe that every fetus conceived should be aborted! That's a "pro-abortion" policy! In contrast, those that are pro-choice support abortion rights. Therefore, it's fine to say that someone is pro-abortion rights, but it's a fallacy to label someone "pro-abortion."

P.S. One more thing. John McCain kept crediting Sarah Palin for her support for families with children suffering from autism. Autism is a horrible affliction that deserves much more attention from the government. However, what McCain meant to say was that Sarah Palin is an advocate for families with children suffering from down-syndrome. Palin's infant son, Trig, suffers from down-syndrome, not autism. Needless to say, the government would be well served to design programs that combat both of these conditions.

John McCain is the Penguin!

Via Ezra Klein.

He even sorta laughs like him!

Traitor!

Via Think Progress.

The unrepentant filth that is the McCain-Palin campaign continues again at this rally in my home state of Wisconsin where some woman yells "traitor!" while McCain is describing (inaccurately) Obama's tax plan. John McCain, who constantly talks about honor, smiles and continues his speech. Then the crowd begins to chant "USA, USA, USA!" This makes me extremely ashamed of my home state, these people are not patriotic Americans. I remember when I was 12 years old watching the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, I used to think it was cool when people would chant USA over and over again. My mother cautioned me at the time, that while there's nothing wrong with having pride in one's country, to chant USA like that represented the ugly American. I kind of shrugged her off at the time, but it turns out my mother's warning was extremely prescient (as so many of her thoughts have proven to be over the years!). This is the ugly American. Republican supporters always chant this in response to their candidates railing against the Democrats. They seem to believe that Democrats are trying to hurt America. What the fuck is wrong with these people? They did the same thing at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul whenever a Code Pink protester would interrupt a speech. I have to be honest, while I agree with the message of Code Pink, I don't necessarily agree with their methods. I think that Code Pink often does more harm to the anti-war cause than good. However, to chant "USA, USA, USA!" at these women, as if they don't love their country is an absolute abomination. The Republicans have nothing to run on except resentment and hatred. Hatred of African-Americans. Hatred of Muslims. Hatred of intellectuals. In short, hatred of anyone that is not like them. This truly represents Rome before the fall. How do you reason with people like this. I'm glad to see that my beloved state of Wisconsin is still trending blue, and I'm confident that Barack Obama will win the state. However, I'm deeply ashamed of the type of reactionary and mindless anger that persists in these people. That woman, whomever she is, and the people that chanted USA are not real Americans, despite proclaiming themselves the exclusive holders of the title. I will refrain from stating what I really think of these individuals, because if I were to do so I would be playing their game, on their terms. I simply refuse to do that. This is desperation. This is folly. This is fear coming home to roost. Vote Obama '08!

The Maverick King of Phoniness

Recently, I finished reading this explosive Rolling Stone piece on John McCain by Tim Dickinson. This article comprehensively outlines a side of McCain that his adoring fans in the MSM have never bothered to report on, or even look into. Not all in the blogosphere have received this article well, but it certainly has its defenders. I'm of the mind that the article is fair. Dickinson certainly is one-sided in his portrayal of McCain, however he sources everything and even has numerous direct quotes from McCain's associates of the past and present (most importantly a number of his fellow POWs at the Hanoi Hilton). I strongly recommend that you give this article a read. Definitely approach it with a grain of salt, as it is quite one-sided. However, it's important to note that until recently the MSM has only ever said positive things about McCain; don't ever forget that everyone has a dark side. Yes, that does include Obama and the Democrats. After all, we're all human!

So this is what it's come to

(Via Jason Zengerle at The Plank)

Did you see that? John McCain asked a crowd of supporters "Who is the real Barack Obama?" In response, some man in the audience yelled "terrorist!" What did John McCain do? Well, he continued with his speech. Pretty mavericky, huh? This is the measure of just how far John McCain has fallen. This is what his campaign has inspired. Insipid hatred. Vile racism. God Bless America! The same can be said of Sarah Palin (color me unsurprised!). In some of the recent rallies she has headlined an African-American sound technician was told to "sit down, boy!" and when she asked the crowd what should be done about Barack Obama, another good ol' boy shouted "kill him!" Once again, what did noted hockey mom Sarah "Barracuda" Palin do about this? Let's just say the silence was deafening as she cracked a smile. (Links courtesy of Christopher Orr over at the Plank) How do McCain and Palin look at themselves in the mirror? How do they sleep at night? Have they been consumed so thoroughly by amorality that they are completely and utterly indifferent? Do they enjoy this? Or, is this campaign tearing them apart inside? For their sake, I hope that it's the last one. I'm 24 years old. I can't make the claim that I've seen a lot of things, because I haven't. However, never in my life have I experienced so vile an endeavor as the McCain-Palin campaign. Christopher Orr says it best "If Steve Schmidt and the other architects of this increasingly disgraceful candidacy didn't anticipate such an outpouring of violent, racist bile, they are imbeciles. If they did, they are worse." John McCain, to paraphrase the great Joseph N. Welch, "Have you no decency, sir?"

Disturbing Possibilities

Via Michael Tomasky, I found this unsettling post from Robert Dreyfuss over at The Nation. Dreyfuss reports on the tenous situation on the northern Lebanon border with Syria, were the Lebanese media reports there are at least 10,000 amassed Syrian troops. It's becoming increasingly clear that Syria believes that groups operating in northern Lebanon pose a serious threat to its security. This set of circumstances is particularly disturbing because Syria is currently in the midst of negotiations with Israel over a peace deal that would include a return of the Golan Heights to Syria.

Despite the obvious consequences of a Syrian invasion of northern Lebanon including civilian casualties and a possible collapse of the talks between Syria and Israel, it could also be a huge boon to John McCain. This is of course completely illogical, however, the voting patterns of the American people are rarely steeped in logic. Rationally, one would conclude that an increasingly calamitous and unstable situation in the Middle East would call for a different approach. However, as was demonstrated in 2004, the Republicans usually shift into full bear fear mongering mode (with a great deal of help from the MSM) in order to remind the public that only they can protect America from the terrorists. The surrender happy Democrats would cut and run. There's no doubt that McCain in his infinite wisdom would proclaim that "we are all Lebanese" now, just as he did when Russian made incursions into Georgia. We see this over and over again from McCain. The man is prone to hyperbole. In fact, it's probably fair to call him a hypochondriac. Whenever anything happens, he completely freaks out. When Russia invaded the South Ossetian region of Georgia it was the "greatest foreign policy challenge since the fall of the Soviet Union." Also, McCain has regurlarly called the current financial crisis (actually, he calls it a fiscal crisis, which Matt Yglesias is right to point out is wrong) the "greatest crisis since World War II." Admittedly, the current fall out on Wall Street could prove to be the greatest crisis since World War II, but is irresponsible for McCain to say so before the entire scope of the problem is known. Anyways, to get back to my point, many in the media like Chris Matthews and Wolf Blitzer and Tom Brokaw would tout McCains resolute stances on national security and foreign policy. It doesn't matter that John McCain's views are completely wrongheaded, in today's media landscape a strong disposition towards military force and increased tensions with America's "enemies" is equated with deep understanding of international affairs.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user failasoof April 25, 2007

Wah! Wah! I'm losing! TIME OUT!

Look, John McCain, there's no crying in baseball! You can't call time out! You've said numerous times that you don't know a lot about economics, and suddenly you are going to rescue the bailout package! This reminds me of something I would've tried in high school debate! I really hope people are smart enought to see through this. To anyone that's unsure, THIS IS A TOTAL GIMMICK! It's a stunt! McCain knows he has no credibility on the economy so he's hoping a little political theater will save the day. Bullshit. Don't buy it. For those of you that aren't yet convinced of Sarah Palin's knownothingism check out this clip courtesy of Think Progress:



I'm sorry, but I have no fucking clue what she just said. I'm in league with Glenn Greenwald on this, I actually feel sorry for her in this instance because she clearly has no idea what the hell she's talking about. I'm pretty sure bailing out Wall Street has nothing to do with health care reform, but perhaps I'm just being inflexible!

OK, Now I'm Just Pissed!

In past posts, I've had some harsh criticism for John McCain. But this time, seriously, he's stuck a personal chord. You dishonorable, undignified fool. My ire is the result of this post by Democracy Arsenal's Max Bergmann, which came to my attention via Ezra Klein. John McCain has completely flip-flopped on the issue of U.S. involvement in the Northern Ireland Peace Process. Here's what John McCain wrote in 1996:

"Motivated by romantic, anachronistic notions of Irish republicanism, some prominent Irish-Americans persuaded the president (over the objection of the State Department) to jump headfirst into the Northern Ireland problem, severely straining our relations with London...[through our] mistaken involvement in the Northern Ireland problem, President Clinton has deepened the risk to his credibility and further damaged relations with our British allies." [Foreign Policy, Summer 1996]

OK, now I realize this is from 12 years ago, but that's just an outrageous claim. This condescending, cowardly rant reeks of the up most hypocrisy. John McCain is incredibly supportive of groups lobbying in favor of Israel, but apparently lobbying in support of peace in Ireland is repulsive to him. That's not to take anything away from Israel or those that ardently support it. While I have a number of disagreements with some of the U.S.'s strongest voices in support of Israel, I admire their devotion to Israel and the Israeli people and they have every right to petition and lobby their government in support of Israel. The same should go for those who love Ireland, right? Well not if you're John McCain! If you're an Irish-American that supports peace efforts in Northern Ireland you're simply motivated by "romantic and anachronistic notions of Irish Republicanism." Also, if anything this has helped our relationship with Great Britain. Indeed, as Bergmann points out in his post, via a quote from Congressman Richard Neal, Tony Blair has actually thanked the U.S. for it's efforts in the peace process! Man, it's hard to contemplate how unbelievably stupid John McCain is. He literally makes George W. Bush look like Aristotle!

Anyways, I mentioned that John McCain flip-flopped, well here's John McCain today in Pennsylvania flipping and flopping:

If I am elected President, I will continue America’s leadership role. I am committed, as I know the American people are committed, to furthering the bonds of cooperation that have been forged in Northern Ireland’s peace process. As a demonstration of that commitment, I will continue the practice, begun by President Clinton, of appointing a U.S. Special Envoy for Northern Ireland. I know Senator Obama has questioned whether that appointment is needed. I would urge him to reconsider. If I am elected president, I assure you that there will be no weakening in America’s commitment to peace in Northern Ireland. I’ll maintain the special U.S. envoy for Northern Ireland, and I will welcome peacemakers to the White House.

Flip-Flop! Flip-Flop! Flip-Flop! Bergmann says he's not sure if McCain just can't remember his previous position or if he's just lying. I assume the worst and that McCain is lying. But if he's not, then his demonstrable senility disqualifies him for the presidency.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user News Corpse May 23, 2008

Two Items

I'd like to call my dear readers attention to two articles that I think are well worth a read. The first is by Alan Wolfe, a noted political scientist at Boston College. Wolfe's article dissects why McCain essentially has to lie in order to sell his candidacy. The key graf:

The current lie du jour of the McCain campaign is that their man will aggressively take on the greed that is causing the collapse on Wall Street. Given McCain's lack of interest in the economy, wealthy campaign contributors, and ideological hostility toward government regulation, this stance is laughable. But McCain's lie unconsciously reveals an important truth, which is that when the economy goes into a tailspin, the public prefers a solution long identified with liberalism. McCain could tell the truth, which is that he is all for the free market and can barely wait until the crisis passes so the rich can go about the business of becoming ever richer. But if he does that, he will lose. McCain wants to win. Therefore he lies.

The second article is over at the American Prospect and is written by Matt Yglesias. Yglesias argues that it would be prudent for Barack Obama to once again highlight his foreign policy and national security bonafides. He focuses on the fact that the president has a lot more control over foreign policy matters than he/she does over domestic issues. Indeed, no matter the outcome of the presidential election, the Democratic majority is certain to expand. This majority will be able to hinder many of the more undesirable elements of McCain's domestic agenda. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said on the foreign policy front. Here, McCain will have the ability to send troops wherever he pleases, with little to no intervention from Congress. This is disturbing since the McCain foreign policy platform makes the international policies of the Bush administration look tame.

The Era of the Lie

Michael Tomasky asks a simple question: How do you fight these people? I don't really think anyone, particularly the Obama campaign, has quite figured that out yet. It is absolutely stunning the role that dishonesty has played in the McCain campaign. These people just continue to lie. Even after they've been caught. It's utterly baffling! The obvious example is Palin and her lies regarding the Bridge to Nowhere and earmarks. However, it doesn't end there. Most of you have no doubt heard of the Fed's bailout of AIG. Everyone that is currently reading these words, is now a partial owner of AIG, as the taxpayers now own 80% of the insurance giant. Congrats...I guess. Of course as Tomasky points out, McCain (in light of this news) is talking about the need to fight corporate greed and enact a new, stronger regulatory framework. Unfortunately for McCain, he's always opposed regulation in the past. In fact the best label for his economic perspective (as limited as that may be) is that of a radical deregulator. Thankfully, the apparently revitalized Washington Post, has a front page story (brought to my attention by the Tomasky post) that details McCain's long held antipathy for government regulation of business. However, the McCain campaign is out again today, lying. They're claiming that McCain has always been a strong proponent of regulaton. Surprised? You shouldn't be! This is how the McCain campaign operates. Tomasky sums up the situation appropriately:

Imagine this happening in your own life. You knew your spouse was cheating, and she or he kept on denying it and called you despicable. Imagine that in a court of law, a plaintiff or defendant's attorney could lie, get caught, lie again and then get at least some members of the jury to believe that the allegations that he lied were just an elitist plot. That in business, one party could break a contract, lie about it, lie about having lied about it, charge that the other party's willingness to stand by the original terms of the contract showed only that the other party was weak and inflexible -- and still come out of the deal smelling sweet.

I couldn't of said it better myself. Thankfully, the media finally seems to be jumping off the St. McCain bandwagon. While the reporting of the McCain campaign's lies were initially just popping up in individual stories, it now seems that the MSM is beginning to create a narrative focusing on the campaign's outright dishonesty. However, it's aggravating that the MSM seems to be hesitant to utilize the word lie. When an individual makes a statement they know to be false. That's called a lie. It's spelled L - I - E. The present tense of the verb lie, is lying. Since the McCain campaign is actively and knowingly engaging in deception, they are lying. See MSM, it's easy! Anyways, I digress. While the MSM certainly plays a role, the onus is on John McCain, Sarah Palin, and their campaign. This overt reliance on the lie is unprecedented in a political campaign. While elements of the Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II campaigns were deplorable; none of them really ever continued to lie after having been caught. John McCain is so bereft of honor and dignity that he outright refuses to stop. I used to hate John McCain, now I just pity him.

Photo courtesy of Flickr user captainleadbottom, September 9, 2008.

Turning on the Mac

I thought the day would never come where I sing the praises of the Washington Post editorial page! If I were to do such a thing, it would probably be in regards to either Eugene Robinson or E.J. Dionne (both of whom are actually great columnists). Perhaps maybe even a shout out to David Ignatius, whom occasionally writes a superb column. Surely Richard Cohen, of in-the-tank for McCain infamy, wouldn't garner praise from a big time mega-blogger like me. Alas! The day has come. Ok, enough with that. Richard Cohen has somehow managed to write a coherent column about how McCain has completely lost his way. Cohen even admits that he was on the McCain bandwagon. Fortunately, for himself and his readers, he has managed to exorcise himself of this particular demon. Cohen's definitive and comprehensive take down focuses primarily on the cynicism that McCain displayed in his anointing of noted moose hunter Sarah Palin as his protege. However, Cohen is also quite perturbed by the ease and frequency in which St. McCain engages in outright deception. For anyone interested in reading a chronicle of the divorce between John McCain and one of his most ardent supporters, Cohen's column is a can't miss.

Hitting Back

FINALLY! Barack Obama, it would seem, has gotten the message and is beginning to hammer John McCain. The McCain campaign is lying at a pace and frequency that is absolutely mind boggling. They have repeatedly claimed that Obama is planning to raise taxes on the middle class; when in actuality, his tax plan will lower the burden on 95% of the American people. Sarah Palin, even today, still claims that she was against the "Bridge to Nowhere" even though virtually ever MSM outlet has called them out on it. This is honestly stunning. McCain prided himself in 2000 as an honorable candidate that would not take the "low road" to the presidency. That John McCain is dead. He's been dead for sometime. The new John McCain is a man entirely devoid of principle. The new John McCain is a man that will say anything to get elected, even if that includes repeating outright lies, over and over and over again. The new John McCain is a man that makes George W. Bush look like the patron saint of nobility. The new John McCain is a man that has sold his soul. John McCain is a disgrace. He's a man that has stripped himself of every last shred of honor and dignity he once possessed. While his military service was honorable, past deeds cannot forgive the sins of the present. It's really quite sad, and you almost have to wonder how he looks himself in the mirror at night. However, at this point, any nostalgia-fueled allusions to the past are irrelevant and counter-productive. This man, this hollow shell of lies, is the candidate that Obama must spar with; and this ad signifies that he is at last congnizant of this new reality.

Alaska?

Via Jake Tapper at Political Punch, I came across this hilarious little ditty from, well, Diddy! Diddy certainly has a unique presentation for his vlog (isn't he dizzy spinning around like that!?!) but he actually hits a number of salient points. Look, I've never been to Alaska. However, the pictures I've seen of it are spectacular. I'm sure Alaska is an absolutely lovely state and an amazing place to call your home. That being said, does the governor of Alaska really have a good grip of the complex social issues that ordinary Americans deal with on a regular basis? Diddy is right to ask, are there any black people in Alaska? Now, I'm sure there are, and it shold be noted that Alaska has a history of racial conflict between whites and Native Americans. However, Sarah Palin just does not look like a woman that would be comfortable campaigning in Detroit or Philadelphia.

Michael Tomasky's excellent post on Palin directed me to this revealing article by the New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller. It turns out that Palin essentially was not vetted at all. McCain really wanted either Joe Lieberman or Tom Ridge but his aides shot them down because they were pro-choice. A pro-choice running mate would be DOA on the convention floor. So in recognition that he wouldn't get what he wanted, he shot from the hip and picked Sarah Palin. My theory behind this is that the McCain campaign thinks that women are stupid. No really, that's my theory. Let me elaborate. I'm theorizing that McCain is betting everything on disaffected Hillary voters. Without carefully thinking it through, McCain believes that if he puts a woman on the GOP ticket as his running mate, women won't be able to help themselves and they'll vote for him. Why else would Sarah Palin be praising Hillary Clinton with every opportunity? Also, this prevents the Democrats from monopolizing the "history making" market, by having a woman on the ticket. Nevermind the fact that Palin's beliefs are completely anithetical to those of most of Hillary Clinton's supporters. Palin believes that Creationism should be taught alongside evolution in public schools and she opposes abortion in all circumstances, including rape and incest. In other words, McCain thinks women, and Hillary Clinton supporters in particular, are stupid.

McCain's Celebrity

Over at the TIME groupblog Swampland, Ana Marie Cox has a post noting John McCain's 13th appearance on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. That's the same amount of appearances as such celebrity heavy weights as Pamela Anderson and Simon Cowell. Just in case your wondering, Barack Obama that "elitist celebrity" has only appeared on the show once.

Via Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo.

Kicking it McCain Style

Via my coworker Taylor, via Daily Kos.

Josh Marshall and Matt Yglesias: Making Sense

Over at Taling Points Memo (here) and Think Progress (here) Josh Marshall and Matt Yglesias are talking a lot of sense on Russia. John McCain wants the US to fast track Georgia into full membership with NATO. Now, for those of you unfamiliar with how NATO works, members of NATO are to view an attack on any member state to be an attack on their own country. Essentially, John McCain wants to go to war with Russia. Now, Yglesias is correct to point out that Russia is certainly not what it used to be. However, any idoit knows that a NATO strike on Russia (basically the US, Britain, and France attacking Russian forces in Georgia) would likely bring about World War III. Unfortunately, St. McCain doesn't think WWIII would be a bad thing. As I've stated before, John McCain believes that war is an honorable enterprise. War, in the eyes of John McCain, is an end in itself. A massive war with Russia would mean more Americans serving in the military (which John McCain sees as the highest possible calling) and fighting for meaningless Georgian villages all in the name of honor. McCain talks about honor like he's some kind of Klingon or Jedi Knight. Certainly, being honorable is noble endeavor. However, there are many ways for one to achieve honor without killing Russians. You could become a fire fighter. You could teach inner city kids how to read. You could joing the Peace Corps.

Anyways, I'm digressing. Many of the same voices that shouted us into Iraq are now attempting to shout us into war with Russia. This is, of course, pure lunacy. However, the American MSM views those that advocate war as the only "serious" foreign policy and national security experts. Consequently, rational voices are either drowned out or ignored completely.

In the meantime, people are dying. Georgia has continously shelled South Ossetia killing thousands of innocent Russian separtists, and Russia has bombed a number of Georgian cities, likely killing large numbers of Georgian civilians. McCain should be advocating diplomacy in order to bring this conflict to a swift but peaceful resolution. Instead, St. McCain, the maverick, is advocating MORE war. Your all smart people, think about that for a few minutes.

NOTE: Matt Yglesias has moved from the Atlantic over to Think Progress. Here's the link to his insightful blog.

Russia v. Georgia, What YOU Need to Know

You probably know by now that Russia has launched an incursion into South Ossetia. South Ossetia is a region in North Central Georgia that borders Russia. South Ossetia is populated by ethnic Russians that have no desire to be part of Georgia. It's EXTREMELY vital that you read some background on this here and here, because the American media is making this seem like it's all Russia's fault. Wrong. While Russia is no innocent pawn in this plight, Georgia is the aggressor and they initiated the fighting. Of course, these facts are too much for John McCain, whom is already attempting to pick a fight with Russia. In no way am I saying that Russia is completely innocent here, if you read the above posts I linked to, you'll find that they've done some inappropriate (to put it mildly) things in South Ossetia as well. However, it's important to note, since it will be absent in American MSM coverage, that the Georgian military has attacked civilian separtist positions in South Ossetia, and Russia's incursion is in response to those attacks. For good, objective coverage of this developing situation, I recommend you consult sources outside of the United States.
BBC News
The Gaurdian

The Truth at Last!

I don't have much to add to this TPM piece by Greg Sargent. It's good to see the Post joining MSNBC and doing the right thing. St. McCain gets way too many free passes from the media, as seen in the new Media Matters ad below:

The Media Delivers for St. McCain

Isn't it ironic (thanks for letting me borrow the line, Alanis) that on the very same day that the McCain campaign launches a new video decrying the media's coverage of Barack Obama; that CBS reveals once again just how in the tank the the press corps is for St. John McCain, King of Maverick. The sad part is, as Paul Krugman revealed during a panel discussion I attended at Netroots, most reporters (they don't deserve to be called journalists) and media organizations are notoriously thin-skinned. Therefore, McCain's calling them out on supposedly unfair coverage of the campaign may cut to the core. However, so far the media seems to be largely ridiculing this charge by McCain. This leads me to believe that I might be inhabiting some kind of alternate reality. Needless to say, however, the media's dedication to St. John, hero of humanity, is still alive and well; as seen in CBS' presentation of Katie Couric's interview with the King.

Despite any implicit or explicit media bias, McCain's comments are revealing on their own. They further demonstrate the King of Maverick's fundamental lack of understanding of even the most basic facts concerning the Iraqi occupation. As Spencer Ackerman points out in the post I linked to above, the Anbar Awakening (the cooperation of Sunni tribal leaders and their followers with the US military in the Anbar province west of Baghdad) came about before the surge. Therefore, for McCain to say that the surge allowed the Anbar Awakening to occur is just patently false. If you put this together with St. John's belief that Iraq and Pakistan border each other and his constant confusion of Sunni and Shia muslims, it becomes clear that the King of Maverick has absolutely no knowledge of Iraq. The only reason that McCain is perceived as a "serious" expert on national security and foreign policy is because he adores the use of military force. Unfortunately, the dominant media narrative celebrates and rewards those that believe military force is the first and only option availabe to US presidents.

Photo via Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo.