Green Towers?

Via Matt Yglesias, I happened upon this nice little piece by Lisa Chamerlain in New York. Chamberlain's article details the idea of Dr. Dickson Despommier of Columbia University to build vertical farms, or sky farms. Essentially, Despommier believes that we could build these farms in urban areas and they would allow for the reforestation of current farmland. Despommier insists that this is the only way to truly combat global warming. I must say that this isn't exactly my area of expertise but it seems like an idea worth exploring.

On West Virginia and the Edwards Endorsement

I realize that this post is coming 3 days late, and I said that I would have it done by yesterday afternoon, but various things delayed me. Apologies. Well, you certainly didn't hear it here first but Hillary Clinton shellacked Barack Obama in West Virginia. Anyone surprised? I sure wasn't. Anyways, for a nice wrap up of the results and the media's coverage of the results, check out this hilarious bit from John Stewart and the folks at the Daily Show. I have to admit, that I've said a lot of very intolerant things about West Virginia and West Virginians in recent days to many a friend and hospitable ear. However, upon introspection, I really don't regret calling the three women highlighted in that video "inbred rednecks", "savages", or "retarded squirrels." Now, I'm sure these women are a small minority in their state, but I see no reason why they shouldn't be lined up on the street and summarily executed anyway. The fact that such ignorance and hatred can persist in 2008 in a state that (contrary to what the first woman said) has historically been largely absent of racial conflict. As the indespensible Josh Marshall points out over at Talking Points Memo, West Virginia is 95% WHITE!!! I can't believe that the 5% racial minority in West Virginia is so assertive that it can actually cause that much racial conflict. Racism is never justified. However, I can understand why racism persists in the deep south and in many urban areas in the north. There actually is racial conflict. The population of minorities and whites in these areas are of a roughly equal proportion that allows for real tension and open conflict. In other words, the racism is rooted in sociological causes as oppossed to any entrenched cultural elements. That's just not the case in West Virginia, the demographics just aren't there. So either the racism that exists (the pervasiveness of that racism being unknown) is culturally based or West Virgina is truly some sort of anthropological phenomena that we really need to have someone study immediately.

OK. Now I realize this is an exceedingly long post, but it's gonna get even longer because I still have two more areas of interest I would like to cover. First off, I linked to the analysis of the West Virgina results by Josh Marshall before (here it is again), but there is also another great analysis by diarist DHinMI over at the Daily Kos. Before I continue, I should note that I discovered both of these posts via Ezra Klein, whom you really should be reading everyday, if you haven't been, begin doing so. NOW! Both of these posts point out that Barack Obama really doesn't have much of a white working class problem as Chris Matthews, Norah O'Donnell and the rest of MSM would have you believe. His real problem is with Appalachian voters. Look at the states Obama struggled in: Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Now West Virginia is Appalachia, but Appalachia also stretches through southeast Ohio, parts of Virginia, and central Pennsylvania. It turns out these are the areas where Obama performed the worst. Obama has done quite well among working class whites in Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, and countless others. Now as to why this is? The jury is still out. The CW in the blogosphere, which I believe myself, seems to be that Appalacian voters are more impoverished, more uneducated, and more cut off from the outside world than pretty much any other voting demographic in the United States. Read the posts, and draw your own conclusions.

Finally, I was elated that John Edwards finally endorsed Barack Obama. I wish this would've come a few months ago, but considering that all Obama needs are a few more knockout punches to dispatch Hillary Clinton, the Edwards endorsement certainly counts as such a punch. Therefore, perhaps Edwards' support comes at just as needy a time. Also, it was classy of Obama to make the announcement in Michigan, considering all the electoral drama encompassing the state in recent weeks. Props to the Obama campaign for a savy political move. An Al Gore endorsement would be ideal right about now, and Obama has indicated that the two converse regularly, but we will just have to wait and see on that front. OK, I'm done. For real!

Photo courtesy of Flickr user dsmyre May 14, 2008

Really Cool Picture

Nothing really to this post. I just thought this picture of Israeli soldiers looked pretty cadillac with the muzzle flash. I'm gonna have a big post, a meta post, if you will (I like that, meta post, it sounds important, anyways, I digress) about West Virginia and Edwards endorsing Obama. But for now, enjoy the muzzle flash.

Note: Just in case Marty Peretz, Jamie Kirchick, or Alan Dershowitz are reading this blog (which I'm sure they are not); my inclusion (is that a word?) of this picture is in NO WAY an endorsement of the article by Arnon Grunberg that I took it from. I haven't even read the article yet; which is probably irresponsible on my part. I just think the picture is legitamately really cool looking. No hidden messages need be sought.

Maintenance

This post is meant to serve as a note of explanation. The times reflected in the lower left hand corners of my posts are not accurate, for instance in my last post on the cyclone in Burma, it said that I posted that at 8:27 AM; it was actually more like 11:30 AM. I've tried to adjust the time in the post options section of the Blogger software but that usually holds the post for a few hours before publishing. Needless to say, if any of you have experience with this software and can advise me on how to correct this problem, it would be greatly appreciated. As for now, disregard the time stamps, they are inaccurate.

Help needed in Myanmar

Thus far I haven't said anything about the devastation wrought by Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar. It's not because I don't find it worthy of mention (what could be more worthy?) it's merely a result of me not knowing quite what to say. Anyways, here goes. Myanmar, better known to most of us by its former name, Burma, has been devastated by a cyclone. The official death count according to the BBC article linked to above is at 34,273; however, there are fears that the death toll could be as high as 100,000 and it will only rise if rescue workers cannot reach the more than 1 million people still in need of urgent relief. Foreign assistance has only just begun to arrive in Myanmar, in part because of hesitation by Myanmar's government, which is ruled by a repressive and brutal military regime. However, there is still much we can do to help. I donated to the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Socities (IFRC) today, and I urge all my readers (if there are any of you) and their family and friends to do the same. If your not a fan of the Red Cross or just prefer to donate elsewhere, CNN.com has a helpful page here with a number of other great organizations that you can donate to in order to help the cyclone victims. You're also no doubt aware of the massive earthquake in southwest China that has killed at least 12,000 people. They are in urgent need of our help as well. If anyone knows of any other good rescue and relief organizations not listed by me or CNN on their page, please link to them in comments. Most of the readers of this blog are people I know face to face, you are all great people that I feel privileged to have in my life. I have no doubt that you will all step up to the plate to help those in need in Myanmar and China. Thank you for all that you do.

Photo Courtesy of Flickr user IFRC May 10, 2008

Review: Redbelt

I really didn't know a lot about this movie other than it starred Chiwetel Ejiofor, whom I think is awesome (if you don't believe me see Children of Men, Inside Man, and American Gangster), so I decided to go check it out. I'm not going to go much into the plot of Redbelt like I usually do with most movies because the plot is so unique and twisty that I would more than likely reveal too much. Redbelt is unlike any film I've ever seen before, the plot and dialouge were constructed in a unique fashion that was new to me. It took me a few minutes to get used to it, but after that I began to really enjoy it. I was surprised to see Tim Allen in this movie, in a serious role at that, and he's was actually quite good. Emily Mortimer, whom endeared herself to me in Lars and the Real Girl, is poignant in her role as an attorney traumatized by a rape. The moviegoing experience for me wasn't the best, because without sounding to condescending or self-righteous, there were a number of people in the theater that couldn't grasp what David Mament, the director and screenwriter, was trying to accomplish with Redbelt. The movie displays the consequences of excess, both for those that indulge and those that refrain. As a result, the film itself, has little excess. The dialouge and plot drive the film therefore this movie while it may appear like it's a martial arts film, it isn't in the slightest. Perhaps, better marketing could've cleared this up for the audience. Nevertheless, David Mamet, has crafted a truly unique and thoughtprovoking film about the conflict between principle and survival.

Rating: ***1/2

*Uwe Boll/Michael Bay Bad **Keeanu Reevesish ***Great ***Excellent

The Construction of Terror

Spencer Ackerman has a very insightful post this morning that should be read by every American. Ackerman touches briefly on the story of one Abdullah Salim Ali al-Ajmi who it is believed has participated in terrorist activity since his time at Guantanamo Bay. There's not really any more I can say on the subject that Ackerman doesn't already cover. Please read his post. It's short and of the upmost importance to those seeking to understand the motivations of the other side of the "war on terror."